The vast majority of the country believes people have a right to know what is in their food and that GMOs must be labeled.
![]()
Courtesy: foursquare.com
|
(NEW YORK ) - Across the country rage is growing about
GMOs and their being unleashed one after another on the country. While
Europe, despite immense pressure from the Clinton administration,
banned them altogether, the FDA hid 40,000 documents indicating their
extreme toxicity, to get them introduced in the US.
Ten years after Monsanto's Bt corn was first planted in
1996, diabetes had increased 90% with the highest incidence among
Hispanics for whom corn is a sacred and central part if their diet.
Those GMOs are being kept unlabeled. A Monsanto
official once said to label them would be like putting a skull and cross
bones on them.
The vast majority of the country believes people have a right to know what is in their food and that GMOs must be labeled.
Meanwhile students and professionals, most of whom
agree that GMOs should be labeled, are complacently eating unlabeled
GMOs daily at Starbucks.
The GMO situation has become starkly clear. They do
not even qualify as food. Food, by normal definition, supports life and
fertility and heals.
But GMOs are in fact causing infertility and
spontaneous abortions in animals and are destroying reproductive organs.
This comes on top of studies indicating a relationship to diabetes,
cancer, asthma, and birth defects.
The Starbucks clientele purchasing elegant looking
items believes what they are eating is nourishing food but the
pesticides and GMOs, aside from being toxic in themselves, bind to the
crucial micronutrients in soil and in the plants, preventing them from
being accessed for use by micro-organisms or animals or humans.

What matters in food; what makes food, food - is
unavailable. It is not by accident that the corporations have actually
gotten food redefined as "stuff."
If they contain corn, soy, canola oil, sugar or
cottonseed oil, present in most processed "stuff" in the US, the
tempting pastries at Starbucks include GMOs.
Those pastries contain
GMOs developed by Monsanto which also developed the nuclear bomb, PCBs
(considered the most toxic substance known), chemicals weapons, Agent
Orange.
If one were to be more accurate about GMOs not being
food, one would say that the "stuff" actually meets the definition of
bioweapon. This should not be startling since Monsanto has made its
fortune in creating weapons of destruction, and with GMOs they shifted
to biologic ones (that are patented) that people are tricked or trapped
into being exposed to.
It is no wonder that people hate Monsanto and consider
it the most evil corporation on earth - it is conducting a war against
them, albeit a stunningly surreptitious.
Every day students and professionals who likely have
signed petitions against Monsanto sit at Starbucks eating Monsanto's
"stuff."
Starbucks could easily label the GMOs there (their food
offerings are standardized and quite limited) if its educated clientele
demanded it do so. It could also let its customers know how artificial
(and potentially GMO as well) its syrups are. It could tell the truth
and begin to sell real food.
Starbucks has a quality image but since it is selling
GMOs, it is solely image. The reality is the company is buying cheap
"stuff" and serving Monsanto toxins to their customers.

They also sell the New York Times - more
"quality" image - which in response to the surging national demand for
GMO labeling, said there was no evidence that GMOs are harmful.
No evidence. Strange. The evidence is overwhelming.
Just as Monsanto hid documents showing the extreme
toxicity of their PCBs for decades even as people in Anniston, Alabama
were dying, but the truth finally came out, so, too, is the truth coming
out on the hidden FDA files, the disturbing early studies by Puszstai,
the subsequent studies by Seralini and scientists in Argentina and
elsewhere, the reports of abnormal reproductive organs by midwives in
Asia, along with highly disturbing evidence from agricultural bioweapons
expert Don Huber. Revelations of GMO toxicity is pouring out from
country after country.
Meanwhile as people learn the truth and seek organic
food, at the FDA, the same Monsanto executive who unleashed GMOs in the
US in the first place, who designed the "food safety" bills and then
became Czar of "food safety" at the FDA, having given himself power over
all food and farms, is now sending out armed FBI agents against farmers
and buying clubs involved with organic (the only actual) food.
Customers at Starbucks are paying to eat GMOs, thinking
they are getting actual food, while the Monsanto executive at the FDA
has his agency arguing in court that the public has no right to choose
its food. And, tipping off how serious this all is, no right to their
bodily and physical health.
As students and professionals consume unlabeled GMOs at
Starbucks here, in Europe GMOs must be labeled. And then they don't
sell. So Starbucks is forced to serve real food in Europe.
Here, whether customers drive through or come in,
"Welcome to Starbucks!" is the cheery prelude to Starbucks selling its
American clientele GMOs.
Source: Robert McCollough for Salem-News.com
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/february202012/starbuck-gmo-rm.php
